Eylem Seç
Comparison of General Diagnostic Classification Model for Multiple-Choice and Dichotomous Diagnostic Classification Model
Başlık:
Comparison of General Diagnostic Classification Model for Multiple-Choice and Dichotomous Diagnostic Classification Model
Yazar:
Fu, Yanyan, author.
ISBN:
9780438087231
Yazar Ek Girişi:
Fiziksel Tanımlama:
1 electronic resource (145 pages)
Genel Not:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
Advisors: Robert A. Henson Committee members: Randall Penfield; Devdass Sunnassee; John T. Willse.
Özet:
A submodel of the general diagnostic classification models for multiple choice (GDCM-MC), the excluding guessing from the correct answer (EGCA) model, was first introduced because the submodel with kernel extended reparameterized unified model (ERUM) can be compared directly to the dichotomous reduced reparameterized unified model (RRUM) without model induced bias.
A simulation study was used to demonstrate this equivalence of the EGCA parameters of the correct options and the RRUM item parameters. At the same time, the simulation study was also used to demonstrate the equivalence of the two models when there were no skills or misconceptions measured by the incorrect options, and show the improvement of the EGCA estimation when distractors are created to provide additional information. The results confirmed the equivalence of the EGCA parameters of the correct options and the RRUM item parameters. The results also show that the correct classification rates (CCRs) and test-level cognitive diagnostic index (CDI•) were the same for the two models when there was no informative distractor. Additionally, by including weakly informative distractors, the EGCA showed higher CCRs and CDI• than the RRUM. When the distractors were strongly informative, the EGCA had much higher CCRs and CDI• The studies also showed that CCRs and CDI• increased when the sample size, test length, and item quality increased, as well as when the number of measured test skills and misconceptions decreased.
A real-world example was used to compare the classification differences and predictability of the classification on the selection of the options between the two models in a distractor-driven assessment. The results show that the profile classification agreement was 48%, and the classification based on the EGCA was more correlated with the students' selection of the correct or the misconception-embedded options than the classification based on the RRUM. The results indicate that the EGCA provides more realistic classification than the RRUM. The results of both simulation and the real data studies suggest that the polytomous diagnostic classification models (DCMs), rather than the dichotomous DCMs, should be used when the multiple-choice items have informative distractors.
Notlar:
School code: 0154
Tüzel Kişi Ek Girişi:
Mevcut:*
Yer Numarası | Demirbaş Numarası | Shelf Location | Lokasyon / Statüsü / İade Tarihi |
---|---|---|---|
XX(689065.1) | 689065-1001 | Proquest E-Tez Koleksiyonu | Arıyor... |
On Order
Liste seç
Bunu varsayılan liste yap.
Öğeler başarıyla eklendi
Öğeler eklenirken hata oldu. Lütfen tekrar deneyiniz.
:
Select An Item
Data usage warning: You will receive one text message for each title you selected.
Standard text messaging rates apply.